[non-validated] DORA SFS 2 / SF 0: fields pending
Generated catalog draft. No operational assessment or human approval is claimed.
[non-validated] This question has unresolved selected work.
Question
[non-validated] Has the financial entity maintained an up-to-date ICT asset inventory identifying critical functions, dependencies, and legacy system risks as required by DORA Article 7?
Explanation
[non-validated] Supporting fields await model review. Proposed positive criterion: Documented asset inventory with dependency mappings for critical functions
Criterion and evidence
Actor: Financial entity under DORA Article 3. Scope: ICT assets supporting critical or important functions, including dependencies and legacy systems as per DORA Articles 7 and 8. Evidence period: Current operational period per regulatory requirements. Required evidence: Documented ICT asset inventory showing critical functions, assets, dependencies, and legacy system risks per DORA Article 7. Negative criterion: Incomplete inventory or missing critical dependencies. Missing evidence: Pending; evidence not provided. Alternatives: No valid alternatives; only entity-maintained inventory as specified in DORA Article 7 satisfies the criterion
AI assistance prompt
Develop sixteen bounded yes/no factors for DORA: ICT assets, services and dependency mapping. Identify critical functions and the assets, information and dependencies that support them. Cover business-function classification, inventories, ownership, dependency maps, ICT adequacy and legacy-system risk assessment. SFS D owns third-party arrangements and the regulatory register; SFS 4 owns changes and vulnerabilities. DORA article references: 7, 8. Verify entity-role applicability and current primary sources. Missing evidence stays pending; no compliance or assessment is implied.