[non-validated] DORA SFS 9 / SF 8: Redundant Capacity for Backup Availability
Generated catalog draft. No operational assessment or human approval is claimed.
[non-validated] This question has unresolved selected work.
Question
[non-validated] Has the entity implemented redundant capacity for backup systems to ensure availability during primary infrastructure failures as defined in repository topic boundaries?
Explanation
[non-validated] Does the designated digital service provider maintain backup system availability through redundant capacity during primary infrastructure failures, per DORA Article 12 requirements?
Criterion and evidence
Verify designated entity implements geographically separated redundant capacity for backup systems to ensure availability during primary infrastructure failures per repository topic allocation scope 9; evidence from current review period.
AI assistance prompt
Develop sixteen bounded yes/no factors for DORA: Backup, restoration and recovery. Protect backup copies and demonstrate restoration and recovery against stated objectives. Cover backup scope, segregation and protection, restoration testing, recovery priorities/objectives, redundant capacity and reconciliation of recovered information. Keep business continuity policy in SFS 8 and evidence of real execution separate from proposed procedures. DORA article references: 12. Verify entity-role applicability and current primary sources. Missing evidence stays pending; no compliance or assessment is implied.
Clarifications
What evidence demonstrates compliance with redundant capacity requirements?
Documented technical specifications confirming geographically separated redundant systems (e.g., multiple data centers) with automated failover capability dated within review period per repository topic boundaries; missing evidence remains pending with no valid alternatives.
References
DORA: Backup, restoration and recovery