[non-validated] DORA SFS F / SF B: Supervisory Liaison Officer Appointment
Generated catalog draft. No operational assessment or human approval is claimed.
[non-validated] This question has unresolved selected work.
Question
[non-validated] Has the designated critical ICT provider appointed a formally documented supervisory liaison officer responsible for ongoing coordination with competent authorities as required by DORA Articles 31-44?
Explanation
[non-validated] Has the designated critical ICT provider (not a financial entity or ordinary provider) formally appointed and documented a supervisory liaison officer responsible for ongoing coordination with competent authorities as required under DORA Articles 31-44?
Criterion and evidence
Assess evidence of formally appointed liaison officer with documented coordination responsibilities (Articles 31-44). Verify entity qualifies as designated critical ICT provider. Acceptable evidence requires: 1) Official appointment documentation naming officer and defining responsibilities, 2) Records of coordination activities dated within evidence period. No valid alternatives.
AI assistance prompt
Develop sixteen bounded yes/no factors for DORA: Critical provider oversight and supervisory readiness. Prepare the assessed entity for applicable critical-provider oversight and supervisory cooperation. Distinguish financial-entity duties from duties of designated critical ICT providers and powers of ESAs/competent authorities. Cover designation implications, supervisory requests, access/inspection cooperation, oversight findings, remediation and records. Never score an authority power as an operational duty of an ordinary provider or financial entity. DORA article references: 31-44, 46-56. Verify entity-role applicability and current primary sources. Missing evidence stays pending; no compliance or assessment is implied.
Clarifications
What constitutes sufficient evidence for compliance?
Official appointment documentation naming the liaison officer with defined coordination responsibilities, plus dated records of at least one verified coordination activity with competent authorities within the evidence period. Internal references without formal documentation are insufficient.
References
DORA: Critical provider oversight and supervisory readiness